Re: [PATCH] config.c: fix regression for core.safecrlf false

From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Jun 12, 2018, 04:34 UTC
Message-ID: <CAPig+cTgJbwatnZ+9eAvjQ1Mn7dszWr9Tgh5GTJNAH-jNjV=Cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+dzEBk8H_=a9k1DaFUK=JJBhd17bhS3+ngSUBcBV+7hD-RFMw@mail.gmail.com>

[cc:+torsten]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu> wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing that out. In that case, it's following existing
>> practice, thus certainly not worth a re-roll.
>
> Anything else for me to do here? (sorry! not super familiar with the process)

I don't think so. Nothing in the review warranted a re-roll, and (importantly) Torsten gave his Acked-by:, so the next step is to wait for Junio to pick up the patch. He's been offline for a bit, so it might take a some time for him to catch up since the list has been plenty busy in his absence.

It's a good idea to check the "What's Cooking" summaries Junio sends to the mailing list once in a while to check the progress of your patch. If you don't see it show up in the summary within a couple weeks or so, it wouldn't hurt to ping again (as you did here).