Re: [PATCH] rev-parse: Detect missing opt-spec
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Sep 2, 2022, 05:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cTAN1F1D=DxZF9jbUiTtc4UPnx0hZLLaVFKEecAa-gMsg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20220902050621.94381-1-oystwa@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:10 AM Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> If a line in parseopts's input starts with one of the flag characters it > is erroneously parsed as a opt-spec where the short name of the option > is the flag character itself and the long name is after the end of the > string. This makes Git want to allocate SIZE_MAX bytes of memory at this > line: > > o->long_name = xmemdupz(sb.buf + 2, s - sb.buf - 2); > > Since s and sb.buf are equal the second argument is -2 (except unsigned) > and xmemdupz allocates len + 1 bytes, ie. -1 meaning SIZE_MAX. > > Avoid this by checking whether a flag character was found in the zeroth > position. > > Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
Perhaps add a:
Reported-by: Ingy dot Net <ingy@ingy.net>
trailer?
> diff --git a/builtin/rev-parse.c b/builtin/rev-parse.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,9 @@ static int cmd_parseopt(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> + if (s == sb.buf)
> + die(_("Missing opt-spec before option flags"));There is a bit of a mix in this file already, but these days, we tend to start error messages with lowercase:
die(_("missing opt-spec before option flags"));Show 14 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t1502-rev-parse-parseopt.sh b/t/t1502-rev-parse-parseopt.sh > @@ -306,6 +306,13 @@ test_expect_success 'test --parseopt help output: "wrapped" options normal "or:" > +test_expect_success 'test --parseopt invalid opt-spec' ' > + test_write_lines x -- "=, x" >spec && > + echo "fatal: Missing opt-spec before option flags" >expect && > + test_must_fail git rev-parse --parseopt -- >out <spec >actual 2>&1 && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > @@ -337,3 +344,5 @@ test_expect_success 'test --parseopt help output: multi-line blurb after empty l > > test_done > + > +test_done
Um? Debugging leftover?