Re: [PATCH v9 01/11] ref-filter: print output to strbuf for formatting
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2015, 22:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cT6uu3DqUB+5gR35JS2eigPBizo_Y48rAzFYkbyCm+=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1438692188-14367-1-git-send-email-Karthik.188@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Introduce a strbuf `output` which will act as a substitute rather than
> printing directly to stdout. This will be used for formatting
> eventually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 46963a5..91482c9 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -1278,9 +1275,12 @@ void show_ref_array_item(struct ref_array_item *info, const char *format, int qu
> if (color_parse("reset", color) < 0)
> die("BUG: couldn't parse 'reset' as a color");
> resetv.s = color;
> - print_value(&resetv, quote_style);
> + print_value(&resetv, quote_style, &output);
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < output.len; i++)
> + printf("%c", output.buf[i]);Everything up to this point seems straightforward, however, it's not clear why you need to emit 'output' one character at a time. Is it because it might contain a NUL '\0' character and therefore you can't use the simpler printf("%s", output.buf)?
If that's the case, then why not just use fwrite() to emit it all at once?
fwrite(output.buf, output.len, 1, stdout);
Show 7 quoted lines
> putchar('\n');
> + strbuf_release(&output);
> }
>
> /* If no sorting option is given, use refname to sort as default */
> --
> 2.5.0