Re: [PATCH 0/4] Link worktrees with relative paths
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Oct 6, 2024, 05:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cT6LALKjEappB7QkB7oc88NyMcr40T_qJGL2mPA77K7XQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <zKUnWY8u1SJNeS4oLK85znjacgYJJeN8HefenwaJ9B9Q1YrQAumpAxWos4svaawkTfQZ_HaS3yp6WrOQQI7yt3ZO0UMCfkM0lJDDnMD-Lno=@pm.me>
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 1:11 AM Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Sunday, October 6th, 2024 at 00:04, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote: > > Unfortunately, these patches are whitespace-damaged. Can you please > > resubmit using either `git send-email` or GitGitGadget[1]? > > I sent them with `git send-email`, let me try again and then if that > doesn't work then I'll try GitGitGadget. Just out of curiosity, how > could you tell that they are whitespaced-damaged (so I know what to > look for)?
Hmm, that's very strange; git-send-email shouldn't be damaging them like that.
I noticed the whitespace-damage just by visual inspection as I quickly scanned my eyes over the patches. For instance, in patch [1/4], I see:
+ struct strbuf backlink = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf gitd
ir = STRBUF_INIT;The "gitdir" variable got split.