Re: [PATCH v2] doc: patch-id: convert to the modern synopsis style
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Oct 13, 2025, 16:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cSQB0HbhY2L1Y4mkbaCMiZTH72AtQ+qRg=Z0U9_ggkcug@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <v2-38645ea253c.1760369708.git.code@khaugsbakk.name>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:28 PM <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Convert this command documentation to the modern synopsis style based on > similar work.[1] Concretely: [...] > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> > --- > diff --git a/Documentation/git-patch-id.adoc b/Documentation/git-patch-id.adoc > @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ git-patch-id - Compute unique ID for a patch > ---unstable:: > +`--unstable`:: > Use an "unstable" hash as the patch ID. With this option, > the result produced is compatible with the patch-id value produced > by git 1.9 and older and whitespace is ignored. Users with pre-existing
Is the mix of "patch ID" and "patch-id" intentional? If so, should "patch-id" be wrapped in backticks?