Re: [PATCH 2/3] rebase: accept -<number> as another way of saying HEAD~<number>
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Mar 2, 2014, 08:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cSFWT6kwZUFFUE3=TcfHRUJnx54+fcZCzJwmOSJKFsYeA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cSPKSsVG_yqaQfOCswaENKdUGrWt_YcQ3yZCpgG5jQ+JQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote: >> This is "rev-list style", where people can do "git rev-list -3" in >> addition to "git rev-list HEAD~3". A lot of commands are driven by the >> revision machinery and also accept this form. This addition to rebase >> is just for convenience. > > I'm seeing some pretty strange results with this. If I use -1, -2, or > -3 then it rebases the expected commits, however, -4 gives me 9 > commits, and -5 rebases 35 commits. Am I misunderstanding how this > works?
Nevermind. I wasn't paying attention to the fact that I was attempting to rebase merges.