Re: [PATCH v9 03/11] ref-filter: implement an `align` atom

> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>>>> That raises another question. Why are 'struct ref_formatting_state',
>>>> 'struct align', 'struct atom_value', etc. defined in ref-filter.h at
>>>> all? Aren't those private implementation details of ref-filter.c, or
>>>> do you expect other code to be using them?
>>>
>>> I guess struct ref_formatting_state and struct align could be moved to
>>> ref-filter.c. About struct atom_value its referenced by ref_array_item()
>>> so any reader reading about this, would find it easier if atom_value()
>>> is at the same place.
>>
>> Do you expect callers ever to be manipulating or otherwise accessing
>> the atom_value of ref_array_item? If callers have no business mucking
>> with atom_value, then one option would be to simply forward declare
>> atom_value in the header:
>>
>>     struct atom_value;
>>
>>     struct ref_array_item {
>>         ...
>>         struct atom_value *value;
>>         ...
>>     };
>>
>> which makes atom_value opaque to clients of ref-filter. The actual
>> declaration of atom_value would then be moved to ref-filter.c, thus
>> kept private.
>
> Also the code that this was done in has been excepted into `next`
> so either I send a new series for the same, or write a patch just to
> move this from ref-filter.h to ref-filter.c. So what would you suggest?