Re: [RFC PATCH] vreportf: ensure sensible ordering of normal and error output

> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:47 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:05:54AM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > > (1) I don't think the practice is documented anywhere, so people --
> > > including me when I wrote builtin/worktree.c -- might not know about
> > > it. Indeed, we don't seem to be entirely consistent about doing it
> > > this way. Randomly picking submodule-helper.c, for instance, I see
> > > status-like messages going to stdout:
> >
> > Yeah, we've definitely not been consistent here. There's no silver
> > bullet for this aside from vigilance during review, but probably laying
> > out guidelines could help.
>
> Thanks for the reference. I'll take a stab at adding a blurb about
> this to CodingGuidelines.