Re: [PATCH] mingw: emulate write(2) that fails with a EPIPE
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2015, 19:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQzCHtyVs47=ASs5V2BSV7gpVszbdTFydiRhnz3gtD2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <01da36219c18373f8507e19035e141d7e56b2d18.1450267413.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> On Windows, when writing to a pipe fails, errno is always
> EINVAL. However, Git expects it to be EPIPE.
>
> According to the documentation, there are two cases in which write()
> triggers EINVAL: the buffer is NULL, or the length is odd but the mode
> is 16-bit Unicode (the broken pipe is not mentioned as possible cause).
> Git never sets the file mode to anything but binary, therefore we know
> that errno should actually be EPIPE if it is EINVAL and the buffer is
> not NULL.
>
> See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1570wh78.aspx for more
> details.
>
> This works around t5571.11 failing with v2.6.4 on Windows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> diff --git a/compat/mingw.h b/compat/mingw.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,24 @@ FILE *mingw_freopen (const char *filename, const char *otype, FILE *stream);
> +static inline ssize_t mingw_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + ssize_t result = write(fd, buf, len);
> +
> + if (result < 0 && errno == EINVAL && buf) {Here, errno is EINVAL...
Show 6 quoted lines
> + /* check if fd is a pipe */ > + HANDLE h = (HANDLE) _get_osfhandle(fd); > + if (GetFileType(h) == FILE_TYPE_PIPE) > + errno = EPIPE; > + else > + errno = EINVAL;
Does any of the code between the outer 'if' and this point clobber errno, or are you merely assigning EINVAL for robustness against future changes?
Show 9 quoted lines
> + } > + > + return result; > +} > + > +#define write mingw_write > + > -- > 2.6.3.windows.1.300.g1c25e49