Re: [BUG] gitk assumes availability of `osascript` on macos
- From
- Eric Sunshine <ericsunshine@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 22, 2025, 09:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQvjt8+3EGSj=-wP6p92402vuSg6FtU-kQ_27Ue__upsA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <92bdb432-1f6d-43d9-a93b-8cbaf3c4a7fa@kdbg.org>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 2:37 AM Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Am 20.09.25 um 21:52 schrieb Eric Sunshine: > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 8:07 AM Robert Scott <lists@humanleg.org.uk> wrote: > >> Tiny one here. On macos, gitk (tested 2.50.1) attempts to call `osascript` so > >> it can focus/raise the UI. But it fails hard if `osascript` isn't present in > >> the $PATH. > >> > >> There are a number of reasons `osascript` might not be available in a > >> particular environment, e.g. if launched from inside a "pure" nix shell, but > >> seeing as it's just a quality-of-life feature it would be nice if failures to > >> call `osascript` could just be ignored. > > > > A patch[*] was posted to the mailing list years ago which, I believe, > > should fix this problem for you. Unfortunately, the patch was never > > picked up due to the then-maintainer of Gitk being missing-in-action. > > Perhaps the current Gitk maintainer (Cc:'d) will pick up the patch. > > > > [*]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180724065120.7664-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com/ > > I've picked up the patch: > https://github.com/j6t/gitk/compare/master...es/ignore-osascript-failure
Thank you. Looks good to me.
> Please test and suggest improvements. Should the links in the commit > message be redirected to lore.kernel.org?
Updating the links would not be a bad idea. Here are the updated links if you want to amend locally:
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/D295145E-7596-4409-9681-D8ADBB9EBB0C@me.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABNJ2G+h3zh+=wLA0KHjUn8TsfhqUK1Kn-1_=6hnXVRJUPhuuA@mail.gmail.com/
Otherwise, I can resend.