git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: chainlint test failing on Linux sparc64

From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date
May 20, 2024, 09:36 UTC
Message-ID
<CAPig+cQL73gVDDSH_=8Y6D0Pro58W1O2Rb-hettVcfZudXjOZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<bdbf99ae4d6e3669b3506a7d4a26730aa9cd0ed4.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 5:04 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines
> Bisecting was successful and has lead me to this commit:
>
> d00113ec3474a1652a73c11695c7e7b5182d80a7 is the first bad commit
> Author: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 1 00:29:46 2022 +0000
>     t/Makefile: apply chainlint.pl to existing self-tests
>
>     Now that chainlint.pl is functional, take advantage of the existing
>     chainlint self-tests to validate its operation. (While at it, stop
>     validating chainlint.sed against the self-tests since it will soon be
>     retired.)

That's the point at which chainlint.sed was replaced with chainlint.pl. It also leads to the same supposition expressed earlier that the "actual" file seems to be empty for some reason, perhaps because one of the commands which creates it is failing somehow. At that point in time, the creation command for "actual" in t/Makefile was:

    $(CHAINLINT) --emit-all '$(CHAINLINTTMP_SQ)'/tests | \
        grep -v '^[ ]*$$' >'$(CHAINLINTTMP_SQ)'/actual && \

which uses `grep` rather than the `sed` used in the present-day t/Makefile. This may imply that Perl is somehow suspect or that PERL_PATH or PERL_PATH_SQ in t/Makefile are incorrectly set, or that t/chainlint.pl itself is not generating any output for some reason.

After running:
    cd t
    make check-chainlint
what is the output of:
    ls -l chainlinttmp
For me the output using the latest "master" branch is:
    % ls -l chainlinttmp
    -rw-------  1 me  me  14797 May 20 05:26 actual
    -rw-------  1 me  me  14797 May 20 05:26 expect
    -rw-------  1 me  me  15086 May 20 05:26 tests

My suspicion is that "actual" will have size 0 for you. If that's the case, I'd suggest running the commands from the "check-chainlint" target in t/Makefile manually one at a time to see if you can figure out which is failing. For instance:

    % ./chainlint.pl --emit-all chainlinttmp/tests

If that produces output, then that's a good sign. Try capturing that output and feeding it to the `sed` command:

    % ./chainlint.pl --emit-all chainlinttmp/tests >lint.out
    % sed -e 's/^[1-9][0-9]* //' lint.out

If that produces output, then something else is going wrong (such as PERL_PATH or PERL_PATH_SQ being incorrect).

Previous: John Paul Adrian GlaubitzNext: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Message 5 of 11 in “chainlint test failing on Linux sparc64”
  1. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  2. Eric SunshineMay 20, 2024
  3. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  4. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  5. Eric SunshineMay 20, 2024
  6. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  7. Eric SunshineMay 20, 2024
  8. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  9. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024
  10. Junio C HamanoMay 20, 2024
  11. John Paul Adrian GlaubitzMay 20, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.