Re: [PATCH 00/24] Yet another pre-refs-backend series
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>
> I think this risk is acceptable nevertheless, because expiring reflogs
> is an uncommon operation and unlikely to be done from two processes at
> the same time; moreover, the integrity of reflogs is not a matter of
> life or death.
> ...
> If somebody is really upset about the risk of a race between an old and
> new version of `git reflog expire`, the way to increase the safety would
> be to lock *both* the symref and the referent while changing the
> symref's reflog. I think that would be overkill.
Thanks, I agree with all of the above.
> This whole series is
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Will squeeze it into all of them, then, and merge to 'next'.
Thanks.