Re: [GSOC] Introduction
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 23, 2020, 22:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD3ywtc0Xo8nu22-Uyu78-ehXQxBnHD3eXhc1yvfkqbNdg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+CkUQ8vDG6HHyzX=bEEmzsZX0uCm4cpRD5zev5tY18ZFueuPw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Hariom,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:18 PM Hariom verma <hariom18599@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:46 PM Christian Couder > <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It is not clear looking only at the links if the issues you solved > > have resulted in some patches posted to the Git mailing list or just > > fixes in Git for Windows. Could you give us more details about that? > > For example if you sent emails to the mailing list could you send > > links to those emails? > > My apologies, here are the links to the patches[1][2].
Great, thanks!
Show 6 quoted lines
> > If you have already sent patches to the mailing list and they have > > been accepted, you don't need to work on a microproject. > > Both have been accepted and merged successfully. Those are just minor > issues, so I don't they can be qualify as microproject. Although I > forgot to tag [GSoC] with the patches.
I think it is enough for a microproject.
> Few Doubts: > 1. Do I need to tag [GSoC] with every patch I will send before GSoC or > just only with a microproject?
I think it's better, except when replying, if you tag every email you send before the end of the GSoC with [GSoC].
> 2. Can I use GitGitGadget throughout the GSoC period and for my > microproject? (I'm quite liking this tool)
I think so. I think other GSoC students and Outreachy interns have done.
Best, Christian.