git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [GSoC][RFC][Proposal v2] Move existing tests to a unit testing framework

From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 26, 2024, 09:32 UTC
Message-ID
<CAP8UFD3xiGH72BRdQ=76npUKp8pCF+cLXoNYkUFUNKyejWDSAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20240321202218.13648-1-shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
Hi Ghanshyam,

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:22 PM Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -294,8 +325,28 @@ have not setup the blog yet, it will be at:
>  ----Availability----
>
>  My current semester ends on 30th April and my exam/viva is tentatively on 7th
> -May. After that I have freed my summer for GSoC, therefore I will be able to
> -give a minimum of 35-40 hours per week.
> +Mayand I will graduate after the results are out in June. Therefore I will be
s/Mayand/May and/
> +able to give a minimum of 35-40 hours per week after 7th May as I have not taken
> +up any responsibilities in the summer for the purpose of GSoC.
Show 18 quoted lines
> +----Stretch Goals----
> +
> +These goals may not be achieved during the GSoC period, however, these may come
> +in handy if the migration is done ahead of the schedule or it is determined that
> +the number of tests that need to be migrated are not sufficient to cover the
> +allocated GSoC period further down the line. These can also be done after the
> +GSoC period. (Note that these are just personal observations/ideas and may not
> +be accepted by mentors, hence '_Stretch_ Goals'.)
> +- Enhancement of the unit testing library. An example of the need of doing this
> +  would be t-ctype, which bypasses top-level macros such as TEST(), in favor of
> +  custom logic with the use of internal helper functions.
> +- Add more helper functions in the unit testing library such as handling and use
> +  of parameters defined by environment variables (which I personally faced in
> +  implementing t-oidarray.) I am sure there are other such utilities which might
> +  be worthwhile.
> +- Adding support for performance related testing through unit tests.
> +- Working in other areas of the codebase not related to unit testing or doing
> +  other tasks as specified by mentors.

This makes me think that it would be nice if you or others interested in the "Move existing tests to a unit testing framework" project could review Luma's patches that haven't been reviewed and merged yet. See the "Key Achievements" in https://lumap.gitlab.io/posts/outreachy-internship-conclusion for pointers to the patches.

Thanks for updating your proposal anyway. Except for the typo above, all the changes LGTM.

Previous: Ghanshyam Thakkar
Message 4 of 4 in “[GSoC][RFC][Proposal] Move existing tests to a unit testing framework”
  1. Ghanshyam ThakkarMar 19, 2024
  2. Christian CouderMar 20, 2024
  3. [GSoC][RFC][Proposal v2] Move existing tests to a unit testing frameworkGhanshyam Thakkar, Mar 21, 2024
  4. Christian CouderMar 26, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.