Re: The sad state of git.wiki.kernel.org

>
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 03:03:16PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> > > > # Should it be archived as a static site?
> > > >
> > > > It's possible to turn git.wiki.kernel.org into a static site with a large
> > > > header on every page that it contains historical archival information, with a
> > > > link to https://git-scm.com/doc
> > >
> > > This would be my preference, just because some of the old content may
> > > still have value. Some pages (like old gsoc stuff) would better redirect
> > > to git.github.io, but it is probably not worth the time to even try to
> > > classify pages.
> >
> > This would be my preference too. I agree that some old content might
> > still have some value. We could also move or redirect some old content
> > to git.github.io, but I am not sure it's worth the time either.
>
> Okay, here's what I have:
>
> https://archive.kernel.org/oldwiki/git.wiki.kernel.org/
>
> It's just a static scrape excluding all Special: and User: pages, and carrying
> a very large "OBSOLETE CONTENT" warning.
>
> The idea is that requests to git.wiki.kernel.org will be redirected to the
> archive pages and thus hopefully preserve the content for historical reasons.
>
> Unless someone objects within the next few days, I'll proceed with this plan.