git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] pack-objects: use the missing action API

From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date
May 24, 2024, 16:40 UTC
Message-ID
<CAP8UFD17JiXDENmjERgB0TW=-S=byT-jzyCcXVp35SUU2M9Fpw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqo797xbt9.fsf@gitster.g>
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:46 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
> >  static int option_parse_missing_action(const struct option *opt UNUSED,
> >                                      const char *arg, int unset)
> >  {
> > +     int res;
> > +
> >       assert(arg);
> >       assert(!unset);
> >
> > +     res = parse_missing_action_value(arg);
> > +     if (res < 0 || (res != MA_ERROR &&
> > +                     res != MA_ALLOW_ANY &&
> > +                     res != MA_ALLOW_PROMISOR))
> > +             die(_("invalid value for '%s': '%s'"), "--missing", arg);
>
> What is our expectation for how <missing.h> API would evolve over
> time?  I think it is a given that it will always be a superset of
> the need of rev-list and the need of pack-objects, but if we were
> to add a new value of MA_FOO, do we expect that all of the new ones
> are not handled by pack-objects,  Some but not all?  Or none of the
> new ones are handled by pack-objects?

I don't think the <missing.h> API would evolve much over time. At least I don't think we have plans to make it evolve. Perhaps other options similar to MA_PRINT could be added though, maybe MA_TRACE or MA_LOG. Maybe such a new option could be handled by pack-object, maybe not. I think for now it's better to be flexible and not guess too much.

Show 8 quoted lines
> Regardless of the answer to that question, I think a simple helper
> is warranted here, which will also help the [3/3] which adds exactly
> the same code to upload-pack.c:upload_pack_config(), so that the
> callers can do
>
>         res = parse_missing_action_value_for_packing(arg);
>         if (res < 0)
>                 die(_("invalid value for '%s': '%s'"), "--missing", arg);
Ok I implemented this in the v3 I just sent.
Show 25 quoted lines
> > +     if (res != MA_ERROR)
> >               fetch_if_missing = 0;
> > +     arg_missing_action = res;
> > +     fn_show_object = show_object_fn_from_action(arg_missing_action);
> >
> > -     die(_("invalid value for '%s': '%s'"), "--missing", arg);
> >       return 0;
> >  }
>
> Hmph, wouldn't a small array of show_object_fn suffice, making the
> whole thing more like:
>
>         static show_object_fn const fn[] = {
>                 [MA_ERROR] = show_object,
>                 [MA_ALLOW_ANY] = show_object__ma_allow_any,
>                 [MA_ALLOW_PROMISOR] = show_object__ma_allow_promisor,
>         };
>
>         res = parse_missing_action_value_for_packing(arg);
>         if (res < 0 || ARRAY_SIZE[fn] <= res)
>                 die(_("invalid value for '%s': '%s'"), "--missing", arg);
>         fn_show_object = fn[res];
>         return 0;
>
> without the need for show_object_fn_from_action() helper function?
Ok with the small array. I implemented it in v3 too.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Christian Couder
Message 35 of 46 in “Implement filtering repacks”
  1. 0/3 Implement filtering repacksChristian Couder, Oct 12, 2022
  2. 1/3 pack-objects: allow --filter without --stdoutChristian Couder, Oct 12, 2022
  3. 2/3 repack: add --filter=<filter-spec> optionChristian Couder, Oct 12, 2022
  4. 3/3 repack: introduce --force to force filteringChristian Couder, Oct 12, 2022
  5. Junio C HamanoOct 14, 2022
  6. Christian CouderOct 20, 2022
  7. Taylor BlauOct 28, 2022
  8. Junio C HamanoOct 28, 2022
  9. Christian CouderNov 7, 2022
  10. Christian CouderNov 7, 2022
  11. 0/2 Implement filtering repacksChristian Couder, Oct 25, 2022
  12. 1/2 pack-objects: allow --filter without --stdoutChristian Couder, Oct 25, 2022
  13. 2/2 repack: add --filter=<filter-spec> optionChristian Couder, Oct 25, 2022
  14. Taylor BlauOct 28, 2022
  15. Christian CouderNov 7, 2022
  16. 0/2 Implement filtering repacksChristian Couder, Nov 22, 2022
  17. 1/2 pack-objects: allow --filter without --stdoutChristian Couder, Nov 22, 2022
  18. 2/2 repack: add --filter=<filter-spec> optionChristian Couder, Nov 22, 2022
  19. Junio C HamanoNov 23, 2022
  20. Christian CouderDec 21, 2022
  21. Junio C HamanoNov 23, 2022
  22. 0/3 Implement filtering repacksChristian Couder, Dec 21, 2022
  23. 1/3 pack-objects: allow --filter without --stdoutChristian Couder, Dec 21, 2022
  24. Patrick SteinhardtJan 4, 2023
  25. 2/3 repack: add --filter=<filter-spec> optionChristian Couder, Dec 21, 2022
  26. Patrick SteinhardtJan 4, 2023
  27. Junio C HamanoJan 5, 2023
  28. 3/3 gc: add gc.repackFilter config optionChristian Couder, Dec 21, 2022
  29. Patrick SteinhardtJan 4, 2023
  30. 0/3 upload-pack: support a missing-actionChristian Couder, May 15, 2024
  31. 1/3 rev-list: refactor --missing=<missing-action>Christian Couder, May 15, 2024
  32. Junio C HamanoMay 15, 2024
  33. 2/3 pack-objects: use the missing action APIChristian Couder, May 15, 2024
  34. Junio C HamanoMay 15, 2024
  35. Christian CouderMay 24, 2024
  36. 3/3 upload-pack: allow configuring a missing-actionChristian Couder, May 15, 2024
  37. Junio C HamanoMay 15, 2024
  38. Christian CouderMay 24, 2024
  39. Junio C HamanoMay 24, 2024
  40. Christian CouderMay 28, 2024
  41. Junio C HamanoMay 28, 2024
  42. Christian CouderMay 31, 2024
  43. Junio C HamanoJun 1, 2024
  44. Christian CouderJun 3, 2024
  45. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2024
  46. Christian CouderMay 15, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.