Re: git-scm.com refresh
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 7, 2012, 04:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD0SX30rBV0jAvogLeZgS_0_WDMYTBhkkC4T5_17PO-MxA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP2yMaJy=1c3b4F72h6jL_454+0ydEQNXYiC6E-ZeQQgE0PcVA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Scott,
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Hey everyone, > > I just shipped a big update to the git-scm.com website, incorporating > tons of feedback I've gotten on the site, especially from new users, > over the years. I think it will help new users to Git find the right > installer and get up and running easier. I have other ideas of things > to add to it in the future, but I think this is much better than the > site that has served us well for a few years now. > > Some other interesting things to note: > > * There is now permanent man page hosting here, for example: > http://git-scm.com/docs/git-fsck. You can also reference any older > version of any command: http://git-scm.com/docs/git-fsck/1.5.5
Great!
> * We designed a new logo[1] - there are multiple variations available > for download on the site under the most permissive CC license for any > use.
I prefer the old one.
> * The Pro Git book (and all of it's translations) has been directly > incorporated into the site and has better permalinks and section > anchors. progit.org will soon be redirecting to git-scm.com.
It's good to have it integrated but on the other hand I don't like the boxes on the left side of each page about the book. It just looks to me like an (annoying) ad.
> * Matthew McCullough has started a video series[2] for newbies and > will continue to do more developer and intermediate type videos as > well.
Nice.
Show 6 quoted lines
> * There are still a few asciidoc parsing issues that we're working on > - if you find anything that's weird please report it at our issue > tracker: https://github.com/github/gitscm-next/issues > > Let me know if you run into anything or there are any features you > would like to see.
I would like the page about the git authors to be back.
Thanks, Christian.