> People seem to add the above to their test-path helper patches, but
> unless the coverage of the work is fairly thorough and you want to
> say "all the similar issues should be found with this command and I
> addressed all of them", I do not see much point saying how you found
> one of them and addressed it.
Understood. Will remove in v2.
Pablo <pabloosabaterr@gmail.com> writes:
> This seems fine but it could add more about why it is better,
> something like: by reporting loudly what expectation was not met.
Good point. Will expand the description in v2.
> I think it is because of how it is explained on Ideas for
> microprojects [1].
Yes, that was the reason. Thanks for pointing it out.
Aditya Indora <adityabnw07@gmail.com>