Re: Git documentation at kernel.org
- From
Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2012, 23:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP2yMa+2E6101fe3Z2WTCfuGnq17WT7nDUQr7PVH6_YKRnNifw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120212222508.GA25619@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hey,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> kernel.org is probably the most "official" place for developers, but for >> Git users, http://git-scm.com/ is most likely the best entry point. If >> it were not for historical reasons, I think http://git-scm.com/docs/ or >> so would be the most natural URL to host official docs. > > Good point. That is probably the best place to host it. > > As far as historical reasons, perhaps the right answer is to put the > documentation where it makes sense to go _now_, and ask kernel.org to > issue http redirects for http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs.
I would be happy to set this up. I'm currently in the process of revamping the website and this is one of the things I'm planning on doing anyways - not just hosting the generated docs, but also making them searchable and whatnot.
Actually, as long as I'm on this, what do people think about git-scm hosting the wiki as well? As far as I can tell, it was down for months and now it's back in some sort of weird read-only state. If I imported everything into a different wiki and hosted it on git-scm would that be acceptable?
Also, something that I realized I am not willing to maintain any more is the Git Community Book. It was an experiment at reorganizing some of the docs, but instead I spent my time on Pro Git, which is CC licensed. Would anyone object to me removing the community book from the git-scm site and more tightly integrating the Pro Git content? It's more up to date and better content, I feel - I would rather have one book to maintain than two. However, since it is a commercial product (albeit a Creative Commons licensed one), I wasn't sure if people would have an issue with it.
Scott