Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re: cherry-pick and 'log --no-walk' and ordering
- From
Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2012, 22:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOeW2eEbN-n72cq4Ywt=o6uVFkBWB5L6jAn9Qx_FBwyZLJdjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1ujacwcd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> writes: > >> Makes sense. The shortlog example is a good example of sorting that >> completely reorders the commit graph sometimes even making sense for >> ranges. Thanks! > > By the way, does this topic relate to the long stalled "rebase" > topic from you, and if so how?
Yes, but only through the first patch in the series. Unless I'm mistaken, I would can get a list of revisions to rebase using git-patch-id, but to convert that into a instruction list with running git-log on each commit, I planned to use 'git rev-list --format=... --no-walk=unsorted --stdin', which of course doesn't exist before patch 1/4.
The rest of the current series is a little fuzzy to me, especially the confusion about reversing or not. Feel free to split out patch 1 into a separate topic if you like, or however you would handle that.