Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] reftable: check for trailing newline in 'tables.list'
- From
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2025, 15:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOLa=ZTaLF9X+gqR1rhymfY5L=z8h0wsEQ-DW1Vi3LQe1Zd86w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqo6r793iw.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 103 quoted lines
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/reftable/basics.h b/reftable/basics.h
>> index 7d22f96261..019dfe6d7e 100644
>> --- a/reftable/basics.h
>> +++ b/reftable/basics.h
>> @@ -167,10 +167,11 @@ void free_names(char **a);
>>
>> /*
>> * Parse a newline separated list of names. `size` is the length of the buffer,
>> - * without terminating '\0'. Empty names are discarded. Returns a `NULL`
>> - * pointer when allocations fail.
>> + * without terminating '\0'. Empty names are discarded.
>> + *
>> + * Errors are assigned to the `err` variable.
>> */
>> -char **parse_names(char *buf, int size);
>> +char **parse_names(char *buf, int size, int *err);
>>
>> /* compares two NULL-terminated arrays of strings. */
>> int names_equal(const char **a, const char **b);
>
> Makes sense.
>
>> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
>> index f91ce50bcd..955be1edb6 100644
>> --- a/reftable/stack.c
>> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
>> @@ -109,11 +109,9 @@ static int fd_read_lines(int fd, char ***namesp)
>> }
>> buf[size] = 0;
>>
>> - *namesp = parse_names(buf, size);
>> - if (!*namesp) {
>> - err = REFTABLE_OUT_OF_MEMORY_ERROR;
>> + *namesp = parse_names(buf, size, &err);
>> + if (!*namesp)
>> goto done;
>
> Nice.
>
>> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/u-reftable-basics.c b/t/unit-tests/u-reftable-basics.c
>> index a0471083e7..f77ec96429 100644
>> --- a/t/unit-tests/u-reftable-basics.c
>> +++ b/t/unit-tests/u-reftable-basics.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ license that can be found in the LICENSE file or at
>> #include "unit-test.h"
>> #include "lib-reftable.h"
>> #include "reftable/basics.h"
>> +#include "reftable/reftable-error.h"
>>
>> struct integer_needle_lesseq_args {
>> int needle;
>> @@ -79,14 +80,17 @@ void test_reftable_basics__names_equal(void)
>> void test_reftable_basics__parse_names(void)
>> {
>> char in1[] = "line\n";
>> - char in2[] = "a\nb\nc";
>> - char **out = parse_names(in1, strlen(in1));
>> + char in2[] = "a\nb\nc\n";
>> + int err = 0;
>> + char **out = parse_names(in1, strlen(in1), &err);
>> + cl_assert(err == 0);
>> cl_assert(out != NULL);
>> cl_assert_equal_s(out[0], "line");
>> cl_assert(!out[1]);
>> free_names(out);
>>
>> - out = parse_names(in2, strlen(in2));
>> + out = parse_names(in2, strlen(in2), &err);
>> + cl_assert(err == 0);
>> cl_assert(out != NULL);
>> cl_assert_equal_s(out[0], "a");
>> cl_assert_equal_s(out[1], "b");
>
> Sensible.
>
>> @@ -95,10 +99,21 @@ void test_reftable_basics__parse_names(void)
>> free_names(out);
>> }
>>
>> +void test_reftable_basics__parse_names_missing_newline(void)
>> +{
>> + char in1[] = "line\nline2";
>> + int err = 0;
>> + char **out = parse_names(in1, strlen(in1), &err);
>> + cl_assert(err == REFTABLE_FORMAT_ERROR);
>> + cl_assert(out == NULL);
>> +}
>
> OK.
>
>> void test_reftable_basics__parse_names_drop_empty_string(void)
>> {
>> char in[] = "a\n\nb\n";
>> - char **out = parse_names(in, strlen(in));
>> + int err = 0;
>> + char **out = parse_names(in, strlen(in), &err);
>> + cl_assert(err == 0);
>
> I'll drop an extra SP after == here (no need to resend only to fix
> this).
>Ah! thanks for doing that. I'll patch it locally incase I need to reroll!
Karthik