Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [RFC] push: allow delete one level ref

>
> ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ... Therefore, generally speaking, it's better not to let users
> > create/update special one-level references.
>
> The question was "Is it that we are actively discouraging one-level
> refs like refs/stash, so removing is fine but once removed we do not
> allow creating or updating?"
>
> You could just have given a single word answer, Yes, then.
>
> > Certainly, I can remove the previous section as you requested.
>
> I didn't request to do anything to the change.  I asked you to
> explain why you allow only delete without create/update, and without
> knowing why, I didn't have enough information to make such a request.
>
> I think "we discourage a single-level refnames so allow deleting one
> that may have been created by mistake, but do not allow creation or
> deletion as before" does make sense.  As long as that is explained
> in the proposed log message and in the end-user facing documentation,
> I am happy with the new behaviour.
>