git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Fwd: [GSOC] [QUESTION] ref-filter: can %(raw) implement reuse oi.content?

From
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 17, 2021, 14:34 UTC
Message-ID
<CAOLTT8QRrHp4OmCS7-sV481cMPK2nmVuiaQpqzv_cM5T0HKbRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAOLTT8TJ_VBh8mreExXHdCFb1e6hB1-Exsn6OFdo2sZNkVFJkA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

Because this email was accidentally sent to everyone’s mail instead of CC everyone, so this email was re-sent again.

In the implementation of %(raw) atom (bd0708c7 ref-filter: add %(raw) atom), we use xmemdupz() to copy the content of the object. But if we can reuse the content of the object?

Since git cat-file --batch needs to use ref-filter as the backend, if the object buffer can be reused correctly here, we can save a lot of copies and improve its performance by about 6%.

Tracing back to the source, the object buffer is allocated from oid_object_info_extended(), but in parse_object_buffer() we may lose the ownership of the buffer (maybe the buffer is eaten), but I browsed the source code of for-each-ref.c or cat-file.c, and I don’t seem to find that the buffers which have been eaten are released by the program.

So can we reuse it? (Or can we free() it freely?)
This is what I want to do:
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 93ce2a6ef2..1f6c1daabd 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static void grab_sub_body_contents(struct
atom_value *val, int deref, struct exp
                        unsigned long buf_size = data->size;

                        if (atom->u.raw_data.option == RAW_BARE) {
-                               v->s = xmemdupz(buf, buf_size);
+                               v->s = buf;
                                v->s_size = buf_size;
                        } else if (atom->u.raw_data.option == RAW_LENGTH) {
                                v->s = xstrfmt("%"PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)buf_size);
@@ -1768,8 +1768,6 @@ static int get_object(struct ref_array_item
*ref, int deref, struct object **obj
        }

        grab_common_values(ref->value, deref, oi);
-       if (!eaten)
-               free(oi->content);
        return 0;
 }

Thanks.
--
ZheNing Hu
Previous: ZheNing HuNext: Christian Couder
Message 2 of 14 in “[GSOC] [QUESTION] ref-filter: can %(raw) implement reuse oi.content?”
  1. ZheNing HuAug 16, 2021
  2. Fwd: [GSOC] [QUESTION] ref-filter: can %(raw) implement reuse oi.content?ZheNing Hu, Aug 17, 2021
  3. Christian CouderAug 17, 2021
  4. ZheNing HuAug 18, 2021
  5. Christian CouderAug 18, 2021
  6. ZheNing HuAug 18, 2021
  7. ZheNing HuAug 18, 2021
  8. ZheNing HuAug 19, 2021
  9. Christian CouderAug 20, 2021
  10. ZheNing HuAug 21, 2021
  11. Christian CouderAug 20, 2021
  12. ZheNing HuAug 21, 2021
  13. Christian CouderAug 24, 2021
  14. ZheNing HuAug 25, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.