Re: [PATCH] branch: fix --verbose output column alignment
- From
Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2013, 01:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CANYiYbGPo4jZ5HShivK3Qk58pBaZAEnr71AML+9K4_Yzzkm+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1384453081-7679-1-git-send-email-hegge@resisty.net>
2013/11/15 Torstein Hegge <hegge@resisty.net>:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Commit f2e0873 (branch: report invalid tracking branch as gone) removed > an early return from fill_tracking_info() in the path taken when 'git > branch -v' lists a branch in sync with its upstream. This resulted in an > unconditionally added space in front of the subject line: > > $ git branch -v > * master f5eb3da commit pushed to upstream > topic f935eb6 unpublished topic
Thank you for catching this. Confirmed that the output of "git branch -v" is not aligned well. This example may be more clear ;-)
$ git branch -v
branch1 f0ec0da [ahead 1, behind 2] divert from upstream
branch2 f5eb3da commit pushed to upstream
branch3 f935eb6 unpublished topicShow 48 quoted lines
>
> Instead, only add the trailing space if a decoration have been added.
>
> To catch this kind of whitespace breakage in the tests, be a bit less
> smart when filtering the output through sed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Torstein Hegge <hegge@resisty.net>
> ---
> builtin/branch.c | 8 +++++++-
> t/t6040-tracking-info.sh | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
> index 0bb0e93..636a16e 100644
> --- a/builtin/branch.c
> +++ b/builtin/branch.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static void fill_tracking_info(struct strbuf *stat, const char *branch_name,
> struct branch *branch = branch_get(branch_name);
> struct strbuf fancy = STRBUF_INIT;
> int upstream_is_gone = 0;
> + int added_decoration = 1;
>
> switch (stat_tracking_info(branch, &ours, &theirs)) {
> case 0:
> @@ -451,9 +452,13 @@ static void fill_tracking_info(struct strbuf *stat, const char *branch_name,
> if (upstream_is_gone) {
> if (show_upstream_ref)
> strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: gone]"), fancy.buf);
> + else
> + added_decoration = 0;
> } else if (!ours && !theirs) {
> if (show_upstream_ref)
> strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s]"), fancy.buf);
> + else
> + added_decoration = 0;
> } else if (!ours) {
> if (show_upstream_ref)
> strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: behind %d]"), fancy.buf, theirs);
> @@ -474,7 +479,8 @@ static void fill_tracking_info(struct strbuf *stat, const char *branch_name,
> ours, theirs);
> }
> strbuf_release(&fancy);
> - strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
> + if (added_decoration)
> + strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
> free(ref);
> }
>How about add "strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');" to each condition directly, like this:
if (upstream_is_gone) {
if (show_upstream_ref) {
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: gone]"), fancy.buf);
strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
}
} else if (!ours && !theirs) {
if (show_upstream_ref) {
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s]"), fancy.buf);
strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
}
} else if (!ours) {
if (show_upstream_ref)
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: behind %d]"),
fancy.buf, theirs);
else
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[behind %d]"), theirs);
strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
} else if (!theirs) {
if (show_upstream_ref)
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: ahead %d]"), fancy.buf, ours);
else
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[ahead %d]"), ours);
strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
} else {
if (show_upstream_ref)
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[%s: ahead %d, behind %d]"),
fancy.buf, ours, theirs);
else
strbuf_addf(stat, _("[ahead %d, behind %d]"),
ours, theirs);
strbuf_addch(stat, ' ');
}
strbuf_release(&fancy);
free(ref);-- Jiang Xin