Re: ns/batch-fsync (Mon Apr 4, 2022)

>
> On April 4, 2022 7:20 PM, Neeraj Singh wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:53:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> * ns/batch-fsync (2022-03-30) 14 commits
> >>  - core.fsyncmethod: performance tests for batch mode
> >>  - t/perf: add iteration setup mechanism to perf-lib
> >>  - core.fsyncmethod: tests for batch mode
> >>  - test-lib-functions: add parsing helpers for ls-files and ls-tree
> >>  - core.fsync: use batch mode and sync loose objects by default on
> >> Windows
> >>  - unpack-objects: use the bulk-checkin infrastructure
> >>  - update-index: use the bulk-checkin infrastructure
> >>  - builtin/add: add ODB transaction around add_files_to_cache
> >>  - cache-tree: use ODB transaction around writing a tree
> >>  - core.fsyncmethod: batched disk flushes for loose-objects
> >>  - object-file: pass filename to fsync_or_die
> >>  - bulk-checkin: rebrand plug/unplug APIs as 'odb transactions'
> >>  - bulk-checkin: rename 'state' variable and separate 'plugged'
> >> boolean
> >>  - Merge branch 'ns/core-fsyncmethod' into ns/batch-fsync
> >>
> >>  Introduce a filesystem-dependent mechanism to optimize the way the
> >> bits for many loose object files are ensured to hit the disk  platter.
> >>
> >>  Will merge to 'next'?
> >>  source: <pull.1134.v5.git.1648616734.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> >
> >Please expect a reroll today to address the remaining issues in that
> thread.
>
> Does this relate to why I cannot compile with the new fsync code at
> 2.36.0-rc0?
>