Re: [PATCH 4/5] lock_file: make function-local locks non-static
- From
- Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2018, 17:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN0heSr7mdaMRxsy-Aev3RpBf-9Xvg6Gw_=UyRqV0FPCVx0KNQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8BDaHUs+DMOM7h6Lgbn8qB8yE4-O4iG=t85nG6sQ77zOw@mail.gmail.com>
On 9 May 2018 at 18:19, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> It should be totally safe. If you look at "struct lock_file", it is now >> simply a pointer to a tempfile allocated on the heap (in fact, I thought >> about getting rid of lock_file entirely, but the diff is noisy and it >> actually has some value as an abstraction over a pure tempfile). > > Ah.. I did miss that "everything on heap" thing. Sorry for the noise > Martin and thanks for clarification Jeff :)
Hey, no problem. In fact, the "noise" as you call it had some signal in it: the commit messages should obviously say more about this.
Martin