Re: [PATCH 2/3] git.txt: fix monospace rendering

>
> The "two" diffs may indeed be misleading.
>
> The patch only changes one source and the "supporting material" is
> not something that we need to use on the source file---it is only
> showing the change in the output.
>
> I did appreciate the inclusion of doc-diff myself, but it seems that
> it confused Chris and Patrick.  I doubt that it is an improvement to
> omit doc-diff.  We may want to find a way to make it easier for the
> readers to tell which part is the patch to be applied and which part
> is not in similar changes we discuss on the list in the future, and
> apparently, a one column indentation alone was not quite sufficient
> in this case.  Replacing "doc-diff:" label and patch header lines up
> to the hunk header with a prose to explain what the intended diff is
> may have helped, e.g.