Re: Pull vs push messages
- From
- Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2019, 06:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN0heSp9ZsEkxNReV8EMpNzTWJCLqL2hjQir+oA8bkEE6zv5uA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190711220118.GL9224@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 00:16, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> > On 2019-07-11 at 21:36:50, Michael Kielstra wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I noticed that git pull reports "Already up to date." but git push > > reports "Everything up-to-date". (I'm using git 2.20.1, the latest in > > the Ubuntu repos.) Just for a consistent user experience, would it be > > worth standardizing on: > > > > Hyphenation (up-to-date vs up to date)? > > Periods at the end of one-sentence messages? > > Colloquialisms and tone of voice? "Already up to date." sounds like a > > terse error message but "Everything up-to-date" sounds like a chatty > > friend. > > I'd be happy to review a patch that changes this, if you think it's > worth changing. Generally the way things work here is that except for > obvious bugs, people send patches for things they care about, and then > other folks will review and make suggestions, or sometimes there won't > be any interest in a change, and the patch is dropped. > > We'd probably want to standardize on "up to date", since that's the > correct form here according to the Chicago Manual of Style, and drop the > period, since this isn't a complete sentence.
There's 7560f547e6 ('treewide: correct several "up-to-date" to "up to date"', 2017-08-23), which changed a few of these, but also explains why it leaves "Everything up-to-date" unchanged. Whether that assessment is the One True Way now 2 years later, I'm not the right person to say.
Michael, you can perhaps find some discussion leading up to / about that patch on https://public-archive.org/git/
Martin