Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] tests: add remote-hg tests

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012, 15:47 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0OLE8wqoGOJ+cw1uuYjdema6UuXJU5-wAuWdJuxi2Mtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGdFq_hhjvysViU+rceOcX7L48BkxUbDzKiyT7LakFqz1ikT8A@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From the original remote-hg.
>>
>> You need git-remote-hg already in your path to run them.
>>
>> I'm not proposing to include this patch like this, but should make it easier to
>> test.
>
> You should also have a look at the tests that were marked as "expected
> to fail", since they point out a bug with fast-export.

What tests? All the tests I see in msysgit are expected to succeed: https://github.com/msysgit/git/blob/devel/t/t5801-remote-hg.sh

> I'd sent a
> series to fix that, but didn't follow-up to get it merged:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184874

I have read that thread multiple times now, and I still don't see the problem. Everything works fine in my remote-hg. I still don't understand what changes are required in upstream that your remote-hg needs, and the fact that there is no up-to-date remote-hg branch doesn't help.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras