Re: [GSoC] [PATCH] travis-ci: added clang static analysis
- From
- Siddhartha Mishra <sidm1999@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2018, 08:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMOtk6BafDOX6PkOs=KVPp5rf1wF3Zq9ZWMAiKgw+EN2KTsndg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqpo4i6lj0.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> SiddharthaMishra <sidm1999@gmail.com> writes: > >> Added a job to run clang static code analysis on the master and maint branch >> >> Signed-off-by: SiddharthaMishra <sidm1999@gmail.com> >> --- > > Why on 'master' and 'maint' and not others? Quite frankly, I find > this choice of branches rather odd, as these two branches are not > where the real development happens. If we do not want to increase > the number of jobs and limit the test only to a single branch, I > would probably pick 'next', and if we can afford two, probably > 'pu' and 'next'.
I might have been misinterpreting it, but I did so because that's what it said in the microproject description. Thinking about it, I guess it does makes more sense to work on the other two branches instead. Are there any other glaring issues you see in the code?