Re: In favor of "git commit --no-parent"
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 18:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> That leaves "Hidden History" the only useful use case. IOW, the answer to
> the first question above is not "Separate or Hidden History", but is
> "Hidden History and nothing else".
>
> And a half of the the answer to the second question is "checkout --orphan"
> (and the other half would be "filter-branch").
Uh... no.
If you think that "Hidden History" is all that matters, then you think that
git commit --no-parent
is all that matters.
That's what my email was showing.
> "checkout --orphan" does
> have major safety advantage than introducing "commit --no-parent", as Peff
> pointed out earlier (to which I agreed).
Did I not provide in my previous email a decent safety mechanism?