Re: [PATCH v2] pull: introduce --merge option

>
> Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Junio, would you be willing to accept adding -m without adding --merge also?
>
> My gut feeling is that "-m" without "--merge" in the context of
> "pull" is extremely unlikely to fly well.
>
> As "git pull" is a "git fetch" followed by a "git merge" (or "git
> rebase"), it takes the union of common command line options from
> both phases, and "git merge" takes "-m 'message'" which is an option
> fairly familiar to users (since it comes from "git commit").  Even
> if we are never going to pass "-m message" from "git pull" down to
> underlying "git merge", squatting on short and common "-m" would be
> a bad idea.