Re: zealous git convert determined to set up git server
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:30:35 +0000, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> ...
>> Well it *is* pretty darn powerful (I'm the author; allow me some
>> preening!) but I believe the real reason is that it is the most
>> *transparent* solution.
>
> It well looks so, but I have a question: It seems that it assumes a
> flat set of *.git repos. Unfortunately my current setup has the repos
No. Perhaps I should state that explicitly somewhere though...