Re: Feature request: git cp

>
> Thanks, but that only seems to affect "git log" retroactively, whereas
> I'm interested in it being part of the history so that "git blame"
> knows about it. At present, the blame for a line would end at the time
> of the split (when the file appears to have been created ex novo)
> though I suppose people would end up at that break and could then
> switch to tracking the old file instead.
>
> Maybe I'm expecting too much of git, with all the truly wonderful
> things it does already, but the idea seems to fit into the current
> scheme of things as seen from the outside (I don't know how the "git
> mv" line-based trackback works).
>
>     M
>