Re: [PATCH 4/5] git-log.txt: rewrite note on why "--" may be required
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 21, 2013, 07:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0nFAzPPb0_jTRev6nuicCV81sRQAbe=277nhyyY8TnQ7A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vtxn0wf4j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think "branch names" was an attempt to make it more newbie > friendly by sacrificing technical accuracy. With the suggested > update (see the review for the previous one), it would be easier to > read if this part said "options or the revision range".
Why does it have to be a range? It might well be a list of revisions, so I'm tempted to stick with the word "revisions". As I wrote in the previous email, I think "revision" can be referenced by any one of the syntaxes specified in revisions.txt (this includes a "committish range").