Re: [PATCH] peel_onion(): add support for <rev>^{tag}
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2013, 17:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0n5NMBFC_eE8V_Avy57RrBOgDuUs+V_VMvNY6VkBBZyBQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1371605946-32565-1-git-send-email-rhansen@bbn.com>
Richard Hansen wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> --- a/sha1_name.c > +++ b/sha1_name.c > @@ -677,6 +677,8 @@ static int peel_onion(const char *name, int len, unsigned char *sha1) > sp++; /* beginning of type name, or closing brace for empty */ > if (!strncmp(commit_type, sp, 6) && sp[6] == '}') > expected_type = OBJ_COMMIT; > + else if (!strncmp(tag_type, sp, 3) && sp[3] == '}') > + expected_type = OBJ_TAG;
Interesting.
> gitrevisions(7) implies that <rev>^{tag} should work, but before now
> it did not:The wording (especially of <rev>^{}) special-cases tags as "objects to dereference".
Show 5 quoted lines
> $ git rev-parse --verify v1.8.3.1^{}^{object}
> 362de916c06521205276acb7f51c99f47db94727
> $ git rev-parse --verify v1.8.3.1^{}^{tag}
> error: v1.8.3.1^{}^{tag}: expected tag type, but the object dereferences to tree type
> fatal: Needed a single revisionAnd the points out the problem: while ^{object} means "expect OBJ_ANY", ^{} means "expect OBJ_NONE". What does that even mean? See sha1_name.c:704 where this is handled sneakily: it just calls deref_tag(), bypassing peel_to_type() altogether. If anything, ^{} is already a poor-man's version of your ^{tag}; the reason it's a poor-man's version is precisely because it doesn't error out when <rev> isn't a tag, while your ^{tag} does. I would argue that ^{} is very poorly done and must be deprecated in favor of your ^{tag}. What is the point of using ^{} if you can't even be sure that what you get is a deref? peel_to_type() already does the right thing by not using deref_tag(), and explicitly checking.
Your commit message needs some tweaking, but I'm happy with your patch otherwise.
Thanks.