Re: git-svn: cloning an SVN repo with sub-branches and sub-tags
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2012, 12:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0k7eCTuDdjdABpYrecf7G4_ejcsNmeCxPKSN46406U_2g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4F75A571.2020304@pocock.com.au>
Hi again,
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> One other factor I didn't mention in the original email, some of the > branches have been renamed/moved within the SVN repo - is that a problem for > git-svn?
Yes, I think so.
> One compromise I have thought about would be just extracting trunk, and > forgetting about the branches, and manually tagging the official releases > (as there were very few of them, this is quick)
Just use contrib/svn-fe in that case: it's really quick and lightweight. You can then filter-branch the history and pull out branches by hand.
> However, based on the errors/warnings, is it possible that there is any > corruption in the gitified version of trunk (or the history of trunk)?
No corruption is possible on the Git side of things- it has cryptographic hashes for everything.
Ram