Re: [PATCH 3/3] rebase -i: write better reflog messages for start
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 13, 2013, 10:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=o0OxTjim=+qoBhpHkWQoVWLWjkJPqknPbr29T5ax46Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0mmSKDH2vrz4a8Qb8=++NSAp2x5mCUEuLpPo9HLfmgFLw@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> t/status-help. Looks seriously unrelated, and I'm breaking my head > over it. Any clues?
Damn it! A recent commit is responsible for this avalanche in test breakages: b397ea (status: show more info than "currently not on any branch", 2013-03-13). It re-implements a backward version of grab_nth_branch_switch(): grab_1st_switch() essentially _relies_ on the random unintended pollution that rebase writes to the reflog to print a more useful (?) status :/
I have no choice but to completely redo this bit, and update all the tests. Let me know if there is some easy way to work around this that I'm missing.
Thanks.