Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 10, 2013, 22:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=Y-pO3+g21PLCWOxx+M-7fSmp2FedMBtZ68PWU_TOHDw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130410215658.GC6215@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> It's not that it's not potentially useful. It's that it may be > surprising and annoying to users who did not want that.
Besides, I'm not able to imagine one scenario where this is the wrong or annoying thing to do. Can you provide an example?