git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Why does submodule status prefer distant annotated tag to recent lightweight tag?

From
TKThomas Kitzinger <th.kitzinger@gmail.com>
Date
Apr 1, 2020, 13:46 UTC
Message-ID
<CALYpq68+fr9NeoJO7YcfTV3LBfDG9AHZqw8Apvt-dHYL3_D7qA@mail.gmail.com>

We have a git repo that is used as a submodule that has one early commit tagged with an annotated tag (V1.5) and several later commits tagged with lightweight tags (V2.0, V2.1, V2.2). I know, probably not a good habit to mix the tagging styles like this, but nothing I can do about it.

When I run 'git submodule status', the result displayed is (V1.5-5-gb59dba3) while I would expect it to show (V2.2).

I assume this comes as git-describe by default only considers annotated tags and a 'git describe --tags' probably is only called if the bare 'git describe' returns no result, but is there a good reason it is implemented in this way? Wouldn't it be better to make git-submodule-status call 'git describe --tags' right away, as git-describe already prefers annotated tags over lightweight tags if they are equally distant?

Thanks, Thomas

Message 1 of 1 in “Why does submodule status prefer distant annotated tag to recent lightweight tag?”
  1. Thomas KitzingerApr 1, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.