git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #07; Thu, 20)

From
Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 21, 2013, 17:32 UTC
Message-ID
<CALWbr2xzozGkH23pYCj6XvW3nXF47YCEFGhy+-ivQRrW9FVOPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CALkWK0mUcJ1f0xP2w-fUFr-tMSKMX23_nmYQUYXw3zjw7Hm9GQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> ...  I've noticed a significant decline in
>>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
>>> reviewed.
>>
>> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
>
> Observer bias.  To verify either claim, could you run some stats on
> the ML archives [1] and report the results?

Do we really need that ? Flaming generates lots of useless discussions that would be difficult to interpret/extract from your numbers. I think we should focus on improving what is left to improve. That is of course merely my humble opinion.

Previous: Ramkumar RamachandraNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 7 of 12 in “What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #07; Thu, 20)”
  1. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  2. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 21, 2013
  3. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  4. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 21, 2013
  5. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  6. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 21, 2013
  7. Antoine PelisseJun 21, 2013
  8. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  9. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 21, 2013
  10. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  11. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 22, 2013
  12. Thomas RastJun 23, 2013

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.