Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] new git check-ignore sub-command
- From
Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 28, 2012, 20:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALWbr2wEVzjJ_Y+W9BmakvXCwdFR3OjVH+15tPaDeXsrwaO86w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOkDyE8gfW9TvyP=iE7gVEXOqCpOqMRjpr=Vnyd_pnummy4Qsg@mail.gmail.com>
I think they will interact, but I need to have a deeper look to Adam's series. If it does, do you want me to base my work on the top of his branch ?
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes: >> >>> This v3 re-roll of my check-ignore series is a reasonably substantial >>> revamp over v2, and applies on top of Junio's current >>> nd/attr-match-optim-more branch (82dce998c202). >> >> Thanks. >> >> Does this (and should this, if it doesn't) interact with the more >> recent discussion around "git status --untracked/--ignored" [*1*], >> which also wants to touch the recursive directory traversal logic in >> "dir.c"? > > I cannot think of a reason why they would or should interact. If I'm > wrong, I expect that either set of unit tests would show me up :-)