Re: Unify ref-filter formats with other pretty formats: GSoC'22

>
> Hi Tapasweni,
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:29 PM Tapasweni Pathak
> <tapaswenipathak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:44 PM Christian Couder
> > <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 1:49 PM Tapasweni Pathak
> > > <tapaswenipathak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I would like to work on this with a planner, separately, we can see
> > > > what should be adapted in mine to have everything go smooth and
> > > > GSoC'22 project especially.
> > >
> > > As you seem interested in other things too, I think it's better to
> > > avoid this one for now. It could be a bad experience as it's a really
> > > difficult subject, and I think it would be much better for you to
> > > start with something easier and smaller.
> >
> > I must insist; would be interested in a planner and document prep for
> > the project, I can see some details
> > - https://git.github.io/SoC-2021-Ideas/
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.989.git.1625155693.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
> > - https://docs.google.com/document/d/119k-Xa4CKOt5rC1gg1cqPr6H3MvdgTUizndJGAo1Erk/edit
> > - https://github.blog/2021-11-15-highlights-from-git-2-34/
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8S8TxuTmddGp2WGoPtTc3gwGXzizBfVzKd87otRw7Dpiw@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > to set things for the next steps, let me know if you strongly feel to
> > not take up the problem right away.
>
> I am not sure what "planner" and "document prep" mean exactly to you,
> and what "the problem" is. I replied to your other email and I hope it
> helps, but maybe in my replies here and to your other email I am
> missing something. In this case please let me know.

>
> We are ok to describe projects in a few sentences or paragraphs, like
> in https://git.github.io/SoC-2021-Ideas/ where we describe the
> projects we propose, but for GSoC and Outreachy, applicants interested
> in a project are those who actually write the proposals which usually
> include a timeline.
>
> I am sure not, but it looks to me like you would like us (not you) to
> write a full proposal including a timeline.

>
> For example the proposal in
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/119k-Xa4CKOt5rC1gg1cqPr6H3MvdgTUizndJGAo1Erk/edit
> which includes a timeline was fully writen by ZheNing Hu, and was then
> accepted by us, so that ZheNing Hu could then participate in the GSoC
> 2021 and start the actual work.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.989.git.1625155693.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
> shows some of the work he did and sent to the mailing list as part of
> the GSoC.
>
> https://github.blog/2021-11-15-highlights-from-git-2-34/ is not
> especially related to any GSoC.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8S8TxuTmddGp2WGoPtTc3gwGXzizBfVzKd87otRw7Dpiw@mail.gmail.com/
> is a discussion about the Outreachy Winter 2021-2022 round (not GSoC)
> where ZheNing Hu accepted to co-mentor with me someone who would work
> on continuing Hariom's GSoC 2020 "Unify ref-filter formats with other
> \-\-pretty formats" project. As there were no Outreachy applicants
> interested in working on this, we proposed this same project to the
> upcoming GSoC.
>
> So I don't see any problem that we should take up with the links you
> listed. If someone would have it write a full proposal and a detailed
> timeline it would be you, not us. Of course, as you propose to work
> outside GSoC and Outreachy, we don't require that from you, because
> you would not be part of any such official program and wouldn't get
> paid.
>
> I hope I don't misunderstand what you said.