Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] notes: add notes.merge option to select default strategy
- From
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2015, 00:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALKQrgcYpbae0eu2sT_rOZYq3DsnVSpYua1SZr=TC=dYfG_fpw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1439326641-9447-4-git-send-email-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> > > Teach git-notes about "notes.merge" to select a general strategy for all > notes merges. This enables a user to always get expected merge strategy > such as "cat_sort_uniq" without having to pass the "-s" option manually. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/config.txt | 7 ++++++ > Documentation/git-notes.txt | 14 +++++++++++- > builtin/notes.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > notes-merge.h | 16 ++++++++------ > t/t3309-notes-merge-auto-resolve.sh | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >
[...]
Show 67 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/notes.c b/builtin/notes.c
> index 63f95fc55439..3c705f5e26ff 100644
> --- a/builtin/notes.c
> +++ b/builtin/notes.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,24 @@ static int merge_commit(struct notes_merge_options *o)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int parse_notes_strategy(const char *arg, enum notes_merge_strategy *strategy)
> +{
> + if (!strcmp(arg, "manual"))
> + *strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_MANUAL;
> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "ours"))
> + *strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_OURS;
> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "theirs"))
> + *strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_THEIRS;
> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "union"))
> + *strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_UNION;
> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "cat_sort_uniq"))
> + *strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_CAT_SORT_UNIQ;
> + else
> + return -1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> {
> struct strbuf remote_ref = STRBUF_INIT, msg = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -745,7 +763,7 @@ static int merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> struct notes_merge_options o;
> int do_merge = 0, do_commit = 0, do_abort = 0;
> int verbosity = 0, result;
> - const char *strategy = NULL;
> + const char *strategy = NULL, *configured_strategy = NULL;
> struct option options[] = {
> OPT_GROUP(N_("General options")),
> OPT__VERBOSITY(&verbosity),
> @@ -795,21 +813,15 @@ static int merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> expand_notes_ref(&remote_ref);
> o.remote_ref = remote_ref.buf;
>
> - if (strategy) {
> - if (!strcmp(strategy, "manual"))
> - o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_MANUAL;
> - else if (!strcmp(strategy, "ours"))
> - o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_OURS;
> - else if (!strcmp(strategy, "theirs"))
> - o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_THEIRS;
> - else if (!strcmp(strategy, "union"))
> - o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_UNION;
> - else if (!strcmp(strategy, "cat_sort_uniq"))
> - o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_CAT_SORT_UNIQ;
> - else {
> - error("Unknown -s/--strategy: %s", strategy);
> - usage_with_options(git_notes_merge_usage, options);
> - }
> + git_config_get_string_const("notes.merge", &configured_strategy);
> +
> + if (configured_strategy &&
> + parse_notes_strategy(configured_strategy, &o.strategy))
> + die("Unknown notes merge strategy: %s", configured_strategy);
> +
> + if (strategy && parse_notes_strategy(strategy, &o.strategy)) {
> + error("Unknown -s/--strategy: %s", strategy);
> + usage_with_options(git_notes_merge_usage, options);
> }Do you need to look at the notes.merge config variable at all if -s/--strategy is given? I'd expect the above to rather look something like:
if (strategy) {
if (parse_notes_strategy(strategy, &o.strategy)) {
error("Unknown -s/--strategy: %s", strategy);
usage_with_options(git_notes_merge_usage, options);
}
} else if (configured_strategy) {
if (parse_notes_strategy(configured_strategy, &o.strategy))
die("Unknown notes merge strategy: %s", configured_strategy);
} /* else o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_MANUAL; */Otherwise, this patch looks good to me.
...Johan
-- Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net> www.herland.net