inconsistent logs when displayed on screen / piped to a file
- From
- Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2012, 12:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALBOmsYh5AgpRQe28yUcChqemQ7HFMHahesGj_MPwQXDF-EM=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
I'm trying to use "git log" to generate ChangeLog for a project recently migrated from CVS.
The problem is that
git log --summary --stat --no-merges --date=short --decorate=short
behaves differently when the result is displayed on screen and when it
is piped to a file.For example, running the commands:
a) git log --summary --stat --no-merges --date=short
--decorate=short e9f65aa976
b) git log --summary --stat --no-merges --date=short
--decorate=short e9f65aa976 > /tmp/log.txt
would result in two different outputs:a)
aquaterm/Docs/gptProtocol.rtf | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/classes.nib | 12 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/info.nib | 12 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/objects.nib | Bin 0 -> 1010 bytes aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/classes.nib | 4 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/info.nib | 12 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/objects.nib | Bin 0 -> 1232 bytes aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTWindow.nib/classes.nib | 13 ++ aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTWindow.nib/info.nib | 12 +
b)
aquaterm/Docs/gptProtocol.rtf | 316 ++++++ .../English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/classes.nib | 12 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/info.nib | 12 + .../English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow.nib/objects.nib | Bin 0 -> 1010 bytes .../English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/classes.nib | 4 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/info.nib | 12 + .../English.lproj/GPTInfoWindow~.nib/objects.nib | Bin 0 -> 1232 bytes aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTWindow.nib/classes.nib | 13 + aquaterm/English.lproj/GPTWindow.nib/info.nib | 12 +
The project where the results could be easily reproduced is the following:
https://github.com/AquaTerm/AquaTerm
git://github.com/AquaTerm/AquaTerm.gitIt is possible that I screwed up something when importing the project from CVS. In that case I would be happy if someone could point me out what exactly I did wrong, and I can still rewrite the history before the first release of the project using git.
But in any case I find it weird that I get two different outputs.
I would be grateful for any clues or hints about what goes wrong.
Mojca