Re: [PATCH v15 00/48] Use ref transactions
- From
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
- Date
- Jun 13, 2014, 15:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL=YDW=MUURDOxV5q0Tg8AmwJ4Z0d16bYmw5YiKhVDrJxfWFSg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqoaxx4vwd.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Looking at it, thanks!
I found two issues, I have just sent patches to the list for them. You can just "fixup" these two patches in origin/pu? Or do you want me to re-send the series?
regards ronnie sahlberg
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes:
>
>> Final version.
>>
>> This patch series can also be found at
>> https://github.com/rsahlberg/git/tree/ref-transactions
>>
>> This patch series is based on next and expands on the transaction API. It
>> converts all ref updates, inside refs.c as well as external, to use the
>> transaction API for updates. This makes most of the ref updates to become
>> atomic when there are failures locking or writing to a ref.
>>
>> This version completes the work to convert all ref updates to use transactions.
>> Now that all updates are through transactions I will start working on
>> cleaning up the reading of refs and to create an api for managing reflogs but
>> all that will go in a different patch series.
>
> As this seems to be based on the old 'next' before it got rewound,
> it was a bit painful to rebase it on top of 'master' (so that it
> won't have to wait for other topics if we wanted to graduate it
> earlier than others). It also had interactions with various topics
> still in flight in 'pu'. I managed to coax it on 'pu' somewhere
> above the commit that is equivalent to 'next', but I am reasonably
> sure there are mismerges, as the conflicts were many X-<.
>
> I'd appreciate it if you can eyeball the result with
>
> $ git show --first-parent -m 'origin/pu^{/^Merge branch .rs/ref-transactions}'
>
> when I push it out.
>
> Thanks.