Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] Call git_rebase__interactive from run_specific_rebase
- From
Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
- Date
- Mar 22, 2018, 19:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAKk8isoL--f1gt_p5XZ99ybN+xts=0_AKBo52Ej=n3SMPoMq3A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqpo3wklt2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 49 quoted lines
> Wink Saville <wink@saville.com> writes:
>
>> Instead of indirectly invoking git_rebase__interactive this invokes
>> it directly after sourcing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
>> ---
>> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 11 -----------
>> git-rebase.sh | 11 +++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> index 561e2660e..213d75f43 100644
>> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> @@ -740,15 +740,6 @@ get_missing_commit_check_level () {
>> printf '%s' "$check_level" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z'
>> }
>>
>> -# The whole contents of this file is run by dot-sourcing it from
>> -# inside a shell function. It used to be that "return"s we see
>> -# below were not inside any function, and expected to return
>> -# to the function that dot-sourced us.
>> -#
>> -# However, older (9.x) versions of FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehave on such a
>> -# construct and continue to run the statements that follow such a "return".
>> -# As a work-around, we introduce an extra layer of a function
>> -# here, and immediately call it after defining it.
>
> We still enclose the whole thing (including the returns that are
> problematic for older FreeBSD shells) in a shell function, so it's
> not like we are dropping the workaround for these systems. It's
> just the caller of the function moved.
>
> I think the removal of this large comment is justifiable, but the
> structure still needs a bit of explanation, especially given that
> the caller in git-rebase.sh needs to treat this scriptlet a bit
> differently from others.
>
> If we were not in the (longer term) process of getting rid of
> git-rebase.sh, it might even make sense to port the same
> "dot-sourced scriptlet defines a shell function to be called, and
> the caller calls it after dot-sourcing it" pattern to other rebase
> backends, so that the calling side can be unified again to become
> something like:
>
> . git-rebase--$type
> git_rebase__$type
> ret=$?I've gone with the above suggestion and added back some of the header.