Re: [PATCH 2/2] grep --no-index: don't use git standard exclusions

From: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2011, 18:23 UTC
Message-ID: <CAKPyHN2ewwLf6am3VQr_z4c3_Q5=saeLcZtuY-fEtUGr-41rKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vmxe5pp4n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 21:44, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 23 quoted lines

> Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 22:57, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>  - Since 3081623 (grep --no-index: allow use of "git grep" outside a git
>>>   repository, 2010-01-15) and 59332d1 (Resurrect "git grep --no-index",
>>>   2010-02-06), "grep --no-index" incorrectly paid attention to the
>>>   exclude patterns. We shouldn't have, and we'd fix that bug.
>>
>> Fix this bug.
>
> On a busy list like this, it is brutal to withhold the better clues you
> certainly had when you wrote this message that would help people to locate
> the original message you are quoting, and instead forcing everybody to go
> back 5000 messages in the archive to find it. E.g.
>
>    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/177548
>    http://mid.gmane.org/7vzkk86577.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org
>
> Or perhaps have
>
>    References: <7vzkk86577.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
>
> in the header.

Sorry for this patch with insufficient references and context. I realized it too late, and the time was short.

>
> As to the patch, I think this addresses only one fourth of the issue
> identified in that discussion (it is a good starting point, though).
>

I thought to split the bug fixing from the new features. I already implemented --exclude-standard, including --exclude=<patter>, --exclude-from=<file> and --exclude-per-directory=<file>. But it's not ready because of missing tests and documentation. So I just spilled this bug fix patch out and will now work on the next part.

Show 5 quoted lines

> With this change, it would now make sense to teach --[no-]exclude-standard
> to "git grep", and "--exclude-standard" is immediately useful when used
> with "--no-index". When we add "git grep --untracked-too" (which lets us
> search in the working tree), people can add "--no-exclude-standard" to the
> command line to say "I want to find the needle even from an ignored file".

Would '--untracked-too' only be a synonym for '--no-index --exclude-standard', i.e. the current behavior?

Bert

>
> Thanks.
>