Re: Should branches be objects?
- From
- Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2014, 00:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAK3OfOhC4krFUDJ9nOzMfhkHjX_76L2k+tdEsbqcAzWDseeNAg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAK3OfOjnYXxhWT7Vp-0Pcb=F8ze6wJnqSm1_LW0Zp1FmYZfUEg@mail.gmail.com>
Another thing is that branches as objects could store a lot more information, like:
- the merge-base and HEAD for a rebase (and the --onto)
- the interactive rebase plan! (and diffs to what would have been the non-interactive plan)
- the would-be no-op non-interactive rebase plan post rebase (again, so elucidate what commit splitting and such things occurred during a rebase)
Nico --