Re: [PATCH 2/2] pack-objects: optimize "recency order"
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2011, 00:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAJo=hJv3_-G3w+jREONFJyXp1HtDfNcUv17RfGvzziNJUZ=_pA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfwmgfkzo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 15:47, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> This updates the codepath to write commit objects so that when a commit is > emitted, its parents are scheduled to be output next (but this does not go > recursively), in the hope that it may help a typical "rev-list" traversal. > > I've tried various workloads from the previous message; while this patch > does not regress any of them significantly, it does not seem to improve > them significantly, either.
I'll have to do some more testing then... I feel like this improves things when the underlying storage has higher latency than 0 (aka cold cache, or NFS). But its good to hear this didn't make the workloads worse. :-)
-- Shawn.